Last Neanderthals Podcast

American Politics is a Circus & Julian Assange is Free!

Last Neanderthals

In today’s session, we discussed the presidential debate between Trump and Biden. We explored what the debate means for America and the global political sphere. We also talked about how the anti-immigration narrative in politics is harmful and invalid. Furthermore, we discussed why Julian Assange was arrested in the first place and why his arrest was anti-democratic and contrary to the values the American government claims to stand for. We hope you learned something from the conversation, as we did.

Support the show

Evolve With Us!

Last Neanderthals Socials
YouTube: Last Neanderthals Podcast
Instagram: @lastneanderthals
Twitter: @lstneanderthals
TikTok: @Lastneanderthals
Spotify: Last Neanderthals Podcast
Apple Podcasts: Last Neanderthals Podcast

Khushal’s Socials
Instagram: @khushal_yousafzai
LinkedIn: @khushal_yousafzai

Wali’s Socials:
Instagram: @walikhanah





Speaker 1:

today, me and wally are going to be discussing the presidential debate trump versus biden. What did you make of it, wally?

Speaker 2:

it was interesting, to say the least. Most of all it was entertaining but also a little bit sad, because you've got this frail like elderly man trying his best to to speak like, but the president, the president of the most powerful country in the world, can't speak. What sort of times are we living in right now?

Speaker 1:

yeah, man, it's crazy. And what did you make a Trump?

Speaker 2:

a Trump was just the same old lying all the time as he does say the matters is so funny when he starts talking about the golf and everything he's done is the best thing ever. It's turned into a circus now. It's hilarious 100%.

Speaker 1:

Man you know, whatever you've done good in life, trump has, any better he will. Man, you know, whatever you've done good in life, trump has done it better and he will let you know he's like a little kid, you know there's no humility and no accountability and also a lot of hypocrisy.

Speaker 1:

And the biggest hypocrisy I saw was when they were talking about war. Trump was saying that I wanted to bring the soldiers back from Russia, afghanistan, but properly, and such things wouldn't have happened. But then, in the same breath, he's like, oh, we should fund Israel more. So it's like what? Like it's double standard, right. So the lies are so obvious. And even he told Khabib like, oh, I'm gonna stop this and you know, I'm gonna fix this.

Speaker 2:

You know, when they met at that ufc event, when he is just promoting the war I think he was referring to the russia ukraine war, but khabib was probably talking about what's going on in gaza, telling him about that, and donald trump was thinking he's referring to the russia ukraine thing, because when he mentioned it I forgot where he mentioned it. I saw that as well, but he was speaking. He was referring to the russia ukraine thing, but I think khabib was most likely referring to the situation in gaza yeah, he just says it like openly.

Speaker 1:

Uh, khabib makes himself quite clear um, yeah, man, so one's a hypocrite. The other doesn't even know whether he's he's at the debate you know, I feel like I thought that we forgot he was there.

Speaker 2:

Yeah, it seemed like he just look around a bit like, but, um, cnn like fact checked afterwards the things that they were saying in both of them were were lying about things. Don't know if joe biden was lying as much as just forgetting statistics and things like that, just saying the wrong things, um, whereas trump was, yeah, constantly lying about things, according to CNN's fact checking. And yeah, it is just. It is a bit sad, the state of politics, the state of the leadership in the world, when these two are the two candidates for like the prime position in the world, almost. But I think one thing it also makes clear is there's no way Joe Biden is making any decisions in the state that he's in.

Speaker 2:

So like who is making these decisions? Because he it's not just like a normal job that he's doing. He's the president of the United States, being a politician like, as much as people hate politicians, it's's a hard job. It comes with hard decisions. This guy can't speak, he can't remember where he is. Many people are saying he's got early onset dementia. How is he in this position if it's not just he's just the face of it and someone else is running it behind the scenes?

Speaker 1:

I mean, there's always someone behind running, even if you could speak, you know.

Speaker 2:

Yeah, that's what I mean. So what? What are these positions for? If someone like that can hold that position where he's clearly not competent or capable enough to to do the job, it must mean someone else is really doing the job, and these guys are just like figureheads.

Speaker 1:

You know, joe rogan said something similar to what you are saying, that it's almost like an experiment, that how much of an incompetent person can the us like have as their president and the country's still running? It's like, you know, it's it almost is like an experiment. Um, but let's talk about the narrative. Who do you think? I mean? We both know they're very, you know, the american people. I feel sorry for them. They have to pick off the lesser poison, right, uh, in this thingy, in this debate. Um, but who won the narrative? Like who do you think? After that debate the people were like oh no, he won. Like what do you think?

Speaker 2:

definitely trump by far, just simply because of the fact that the guy couldn't speak, just stumbling, mumbling, forgetting what he was saying. It is. It was honestly ridiculous from the democratic from from the democrats as well like, what are they doing, putting him forward as their candidate? It's just, it's embarrassing for them and for america, like the rest of the world watching, like us, from the uk, everyone thinks they're they're a bit of a joke at the moment. But, um, the most recent thing I've heard is that they're looking to replace, uh, joe biden and find a new candidate, but the only way that can happen is if he steps down. So it'll be interesting to see if, in the best interest of his party, he does step down, or if he's like nah, I want the power.

Speaker 1:

So, speaking of stepping down, adam Grant, who we have done a podcast with which is coming out soon, he asked a very interesting question from Trump. He said that okay, okay, trump, since you are only running because biden is such a bad candidate. If biden wants to step down, will you step down?

Speaker 2:

you know, because that trump said that in the debate that if he's only running because of how bad joe biden and like because he's such a bad candidate like Trump has to save America. So that's an interesting question posed to him.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, it is, but there's no way to step in now man. You could have the best candidate in the world. You know, objectively the best president, the person right for the job. Trump will be like. I can do it better.

Speaker 2:

Yeah, exactly, president, the person right for the job trump will be like. I can do it better. Yeah, exactly, but it's sorry gone.

Speaker 1:

Trump could play football right now and be better than messy bro. That's 100 percent. That's just two years exactly, and I feel like another thing that we're seeing is that the anti-immigration um uh narrative becoming popular across Europe as well. We see, with Nigel Farage, most of the conservative voters are supporting reform.

Speaker 2:

You said something about French politics, that the right wing yeah, the Marine Le Pen's party won the first round of elections in france and she's a very, very right-wing politician, very anti-immigration, and it that's the anti-immigration stuff is what trump won uh, his 2016 election on, like, strengthening the border, talking mad about mexicans, muslim ban all of this that's what won him the 2016 election. And now it seems like that kind of sentiment is growing even more and it's spread to the uk, with people like nigel farage growing in popularity, with rishi sunak and people like soella braverman just trying to send people to Rwanda and Marine Le Pen winning the first round of elections. Even Keir Starmer, the left wing, the Labour candidate for prime minister in the UK he is also like keeps talking about immigration and what would be considered right-wing talking points. He keeps repeating them, almost as though he's playing their game and he's kind of doing a bit of appeasement with the right-wing voters to get them on his side.

Speaker 1:

Yes, he spoke about Bangladeshi people.

Speaker 2:

Oh, I saw that. Yeah, he didn't really say it in a nasty manner, but he used them as an example. He was talking about immigrants coming and doing bad things and then they asked him for an example and he said like Bangladesh, which is crazy. The left wing, the guy representing the left-leaning party, is saying stuff like that. I feel like it's a nasty thing to say.

Speaker 1:

I mean the actual articulation was a nasty thing. Yeah, like it's a nasty thing to say. I mean the actual articulation was a nasty, yeah yeah, it is a mean thing to say yeah it's a mean thing to say and like to say, like it's dangerous as well like.

Speaker 1:

You gotta look at the socio-economic issues that your the system. You know the government is putting these people through and it's these people that have actually rebuilt this country after World War II. The Western they're really struggling with population issues, right, like they're not having enough kids and then they need more immigrants. Like immigrants actually benefit this country. It's like a bit of illegal immigration. Yes, it's not ideal. Most of them are asylum seekers, most of them are registered.

Speaker 1:

So also this argument of like, oh like, if they do crime and things of that nature, you can't hold them accountable, which is what I heard from andre tate. That's not necessarily true. Most illegal immigrants here are trying to get asylum. It's just when an illegal immigrant does a crime, it's all over the news, right? But if a white person or if a native who owns a british passport, right, someone who's British could be any color, they don't give a shit. It's very unfortunate and, in your words, god forbid. If the billionaire loses maybe a million out of his hundreds of billions if you tax him a bit more of billions, you know, if you tax him a bit more, you know. But look like these, all these billions of politicians. Politicians are like look, look, these immigrants. They're the reason why you're losing all your money like exactly the middle class in the working class exactly it's.

Speaker 2:

It's literally just all about the division. They want you to ignore them. They want you to let them get away with everything, and to do that they create a distraction, and that is the immigrants. They pretend everything is the immigrants' fault and if it wasn't immigrants they would choose something else. In the past it was stuff like differences in religion, like Catholics versus Protestants. There would always be something Celts versus Anglo-Saxons always something, there's always something that the ruling class picks to keep the average people dividing the middle class, the working class, fighting against each other, like the other guy who's fighting for the breadcrumbs isn't your problem. The guy who's got the whole loaf of bread look at him. Instead of like trying to look for the breadcrumbs isn't your problem. The guy who's got the whole loaf of bread, look at him. Instead of trying to look for the breadcrumbs and fight the other guy who's looking for the breadcrumbs, you should work together to improve the country and, like you said, immigrants were asked to come here. So many people's families were brought here because the UK needed help After Britain's colonization of South Asia, the Indian subcontinent, a lot of people were forcefully taken to other countries as well, from India, which most people don't know, and after slavery ended it was almost like slave labor what they did with the people from indian subcontinent.

Speaker 2:

They took them over to other countries and did just horrible, horrible things, but apparently it's their fault when they now come to those countries that benefited from exploiting the indian subcontinent. It's, it's now those people's fault for trying to get a better life and escape things like war, which these countries were involved yeah, and and these people were literally most of them like it's a very small percentage of them that are actually illegal immigrants.

Speaker 1:

most of them come legally right and rightfully. Some of them also get asylums rightfully because think the the mess their countries are in, like they need the protection and support. And these people are extremely hardworking. They're young people. It's not like these immigrants are like in their 80s and 70s and then they're here doing nothing. They're helping, they're paying taxes, they're helping this country so much.

Speaker 2:

Like.

Speaker 1:

Japan is having a massive problem because of people not having kids.

Speaker 1:

They're facing real population issue and also yeah, like south korea is also going through that. Yeah, and you need, you need, you need people, foreign people. It's a globalized world, like we should be sharing cultures. It's, you know, it's everyone's got a beautiful culture. We should embrace people. Everyone comes with, like, different perspective, different ideas. That's how innovation in progress comes about. If we just stick with our bubbles and become all nationalistic, you know, then we're not going to progress as much. I the point about, like I'm not trying to justify illegal immigration here, right, but I'm saying like this whole anti-immigrant narrative is really not benefiting the country, right, people are just worried about the wrong things and, like you said, they're playing to the simple rule divide and conquer. And again, once again, the poor people, the working class people, middle Sorry about this the middle class people. They're not asking about the real problems uh, the, the middle class people.

Speaker 2:

They're not asking about the real problems, just yeah. And I think another issue is that, uh, people think that, oh, they're just going to take over and like get rid of the british culture, uh, which I I don't I think is a bit of a non-starter, like that's, that's just not going to happen and that shouldn't happen. I think British culture is deteriorating just by itself. It's not happening because of immigrants you look at in the media and all these other institutions. British culture isn't promoted at all. No one even knows what British culture really is, and I think it is down to people who hold those values to promote them more, like having good manners and things. This country has a lot of good things to offer. It's actually an amazing country to live in as well. But instead of getting angry at the immigrants and being scared that they're going to take over and impose their culture, you should promote your own.

Speaker 1:

I think there is an issue of like neglect towards british culture and traditions, um, so I mean there should be conversations about how that can be promoted as well I don't know to what extent that's true, though, because you know, we say, like our british people don't really have a culture, but they do like their culture is very like they've exported their culture, like the love for football, right, um, what else can we speak about?

Speaker 2:

just the language.

Speaker 1:

You don't know what, you don't know which bit's true, like whether, like how, british people are losing their culture. I feel like their culture is like what you call it it's, it's, it's exported like it's. Do you see what I mean? Everyone wants to be like a hollywood actor, everyone wants to dress western, everyone wants to like, but that's that's not really.

Speaker 2:

I don't know if that's british culture. Hollywood is a very, very american thing. It's very separate. American and british culture are very separate. British culture is like these days. It's seen as just like the royal family and the royal traditions and being polite and stuff aside from football and like going to the pub and drinking alcohol. I don't really know what british culture is, to be honest, and I think there there should be some sort of something where we, we, we promote british culture and we understand what it is, because I I don't know it's it's hard to pin it down. What is british culture? Maybe we need to speak to an expert on this.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, 100, 100%.

Speaker 2:

For me. One thing I'd definitely say is that a big part of the culture is that people are very polite and respectful, which is a great part of the culture here and which should be promoted more. For example, in our country people don't really do pleases and thank yous, like it's just not. People don't speak that way. It's not that they're being rude, but it's just not part of conversation to say please and thank you too much, um, and you're welcome and all of that stuff. But over here there's a big emphasis on manners and please and thank you and all this stuff, which I think is a good thing.

Speaker 1:

It's positive so we also need to draw a distinction between like british values and then british culture, because british values, like you know, acceptance for all religion. Um, would you call it equal right?

Speaker 2:

I think values are definitely a part of culture. I don't know how you can draw a distinction between those.

Speaker 1:

But I would say like they definitely need to be promoted and people should abide by them if they want to live here. And they're very great values I think British, like I don't know if you've done life in the UK test, but they're great, like the 10 British values. I don't know if I should pull them up, but people I saw right I saw.

Speaker 2:

I saw a thing on instagram. It was like the, the, the test to get british nationality, and it was like most british people actually failed the test because the questions are so absurd. It was like what did richard iii do during this time? And just crazy stuff like this, asking about buddhica, like things that most british people just don't know, yeah, but yeah, because they don't.

Speaker 1:

It's kind of instilled in them, right, like it's just part of them, whereas, um, in order to like get a citizenship here, like they take it for granted Because that's just From a young age they're taught these things. I guess they don't really need to know the history, but they want us to have appreciation For their history when we do a life in the UK test.

Speaker 2:

But some of the what is that test for?

Speaker 1:

It's to get a citizenship Life in the UK, so democracy. So democracy, respect, tolerance, rule of law, liberty, like. I don't see issue issue with any of them, and they should be promoted. Like again, these are british values, right, like values, and they should be respected, anyone who comes into the country.

Speaker 2:

This is one thing that a lot of these far-right anti-immigration people just don't understand. Immigrants are not here to overthrow your culture or your values. We want people to accept these values and promote them, because they are good values. But we have our own culture that we're going to engage in as well. Like I'm not going to just leave behind my religion, my traditions, my family, my culture, all that stuff when I come here. Of course that's going to be a part of who I am, but that also doesn't mean I'm just going to overthrow that and like instill just islamic religious values here or something, or pakistani cultural values here and nor nor am I gonna like restrict you from enjoying my culture.

Speaker 1:

Like I've got white friends, they can come here, they eat with their hands, like I don't tell them off, like oh, why you're eating with your hands. Or like you know I've had white friends that have like helped, kept a fast, things of that nature right. And like I go and celebrate christmas with them, you know I go. Like if they go churches, I don't I'm a muslim, but like I appreciate and I respect christianity, I go church with them. Like it's like sharing. It's like just because we share a culture doesn't mean we lose our cultures, right. It's just there's more appreciation and we see a culture doesn't mean we lose our cultures, right, there's more appreciation and we see beauty and similarities. It's not like they are so distinct when you really look at it. It's like it's all about like coming together, sharing love, sharing I don't know, just sense of community whenever, like you're sharing your culture. So fundamentally, like cultures are kind of the same, you know they have good intentions behind them.

Speaker 1:

There can be certain cultures that can be toxic, but especially when it comes to, for example, birthdays, they are like a western thing. Everyone takes part in them. Arab countries. Do we do In our culture? People don't really.

Speaker 2:

We take, everyone takes part in them. You know Arab countries, do we do? Yeah, well, in our culture people don't really well they do now, but they didn't used to celebrate birthdays. But that's again impact of like the West. Now most people in swath and places like this do celebrate their birthdays. Yeah, especially if they're from an affluent family.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, the Western culture is globalized and, you know, with the crusades as well, the muslim crusades and colonialism cultures, like some of the islamic things that that like, for example, oxford university, the whole idea of like boarding school, that's inspired by muslim empires. Like you know, you, just when you travel and you go around you empires pick things from each other, like I love even even one of the colleges I forgot which one it was but one of the main colleges in oxford is.

Speaker 1:

It's based on islamic architecture it is yes, that's very true yeah, which most people don't know about.

Speaker 2:

Most people. People will say, oh, look at all these. They'll be looking at Oxford, like look at all these amazing things we did, and, in the same breath, talk about, oh, look at all these Islamic Muslim barbarians. They've done nothing, Whereas the main, the most like well-respected university in the world, the colleges some colleges in that are based on islamic architecture yeah, like other cultures, have brought a lot to the world as well, which is what people in the west need to realize yeah, and people in the east as well, like the western cultures also like, inspired the world in a positive way.

Speaker 1:

You know, with innovation and technology, airplanes, I mean I can keep naming things right but like it's, culture should be shared, innovations should be shared. Promote your culture. There should be no issue with it. But you know, just like this whole all anti-immigrant narrative that they're trying to run with it's, it's not going to benefit the country. You're just only fooling your people or you're being fooled or you're doing this maliciously and intentionally, and listen. In the short term you may succeed, but in the long term, people will find out Like they always do, just like how Julian Assange, you know, exposed the CIA papers and things like that.

Speaker 1:

But you know he's a free man now.

Speaker 2:

Yeah, exactly, he has taken a plea deal and now he's returned to australia as a free man after, I think, 15 years, 15 long years, of being um persecuted by the united states for for wiki leaks. So for those who don't know, it's pretty sure most people do know uh julian assange got his hand on hands on classified documents uh from countries like the united states detailing the horrific things they've been involved in, and he decided to leak them on his website called wiki leaks, and because of that they uh charged him with uh treason, I think yes, something like that treason it was.

Speaker 1:

It was treason. Would you like to tell our audience about? What was some of the leaks about?

Speaker 2:

um, some of the leaks were about. It was about things like so do you know what Guantanamo Bay is? Yes, it's where they sent a lot of prisoners and stuff. So it was detailing, like, the torture and the horrific things that happened there and the people who were sent there wrongfully and detained there wrongfully. And then, yeah, it was just explicit torture. Yeah, in Guantanamo Bay, crimes committed in the Iraq war, accounts from soldiers who were complaining about the civilian death and other things in Iraq, and then the same thing for Afghanistan as well Soldiers who were concerned about how many civilians were being killed and how they were being treated Just loads of things. Ciaia leaks, just countless things he exposed and because of that, they uh, decided to go after him on treason charges yeah, I don't, I don't.

Speaker 1:

I think he's. He's done his country a massive favor. The people. To call him a traitor. That's crazy, isn't it?

Speaker 2:

Yeah, what happens to democracy in these instances? Surely, if we want a truly democratic society, these things should be discussed and out in the open, instead of hidden away behind a curtain.

Speaker 1:

Their excuse is that it's a matter of national security. So if such information gets leaked, it's a threat to the United States. But if your country is doing unethical things which they were with the Iraq genocide, afghanistan and the surveillance that Edward Snowden then extensively leaked and released, for how they were trying to basically taking all your data away from google, apple, the biggest, the biggest brands right, um, that their excuse would be like, oh, it's matters of national surveillance, we're trying to protect our people. If someone shares this information, you know, then they, then that's treason. But if it's genuinely unethical, like we need to draw the line, like, if it's unethical things, it shouldn't be treason.

Speaker 1:

It's called accountability, which they always speak about. It's called freedom of speech. You know, freedom of speech goes out the window when it comes to these things, when it comes to, like, unjustfully going into another country and just killing innocent people, which Julian Assange released the videos of. They literally fired at innocent people in Iraq. Right, thousands, I mean more than 100k, like people that, just like I mean overall, they killed a million, but, um, the report said that 60k innocent people, what would you call it?

Speaker 1:

um, like those records were hidden, like they. They killed 60k innocent people and that was one of the.

Speaker 2:

I think overall they did kill like a million and probably 95% of them were probably, if not more, innocent people.

Speaker 2:

I think the million figure is regarding innocent people. I'll double check quickly now innocent people were killed in Iraq. It doesn't really say, but from what I've heard is most people say, um, the iraq war all in all, with the numbers that like not not the numbers that they hide and all that stuff. The real numbers over a million innocent people were killed in iraq, yeah, but that that possibly maybe includes other wars as well. Maybe we're getting this wrong. Someone can fact check us in the comments, but that's what I've heard.

Speaker 2:

But, like you said, in the leaks they included videos of just them firing at innocent civilians for no reason, people who are congregated, and we saw footage like this from afghanistan as well, where there's like families, entire families who were, who have bombs dropped on them, like at weddings and things like that. It's. It is really sad and it really makes the democracy look like a facade, because you can't pretend to have a democratic state and freedom of speech and all of these things that you hold, pretend to hold so dearly. You tell us you're the, you're the moral beacon of the world, you're the leaders of the free world, but then you're doing this behind the scenes and when someone tries to confront you about it, you basically try and kill him.

Speaker 1:

Yeah, there should be more security for journalism as well Journalists Like when it comes to things like this. I think that's how Julian Assange got free, because when the Biden administration came into power, there were certain changes in the legal system and then I didn't finish the video, but I watched that part and then through that they were able to make case for Julian Assange, to make him free. Some other changes to law happened in other countries too, but, yeah, there needs to be way more protection. I can't lie like you government can't go around doing unethical things in other countries or to their own people. Like you know, like edward snowden released, like they will keep, america is spying on his civilians, right, it's quite obvious. Like that's, that's, that's unethical, without their consent, without their permission.

Speaker 2:

So how is?

Speaker 1:

that a traitor? How can you call that person a traitor which presents that information To the people? That your government is Sharing your data unethically, without your consent and using it.

Speaker 2:

It's not A traitor to America or the people of america, it's just a traitor to the government institutions. That's what you can say. But he's helping america, the people should. I thought people wanted the truth. I thought people wanted honesty. What happened? What happened to those qualities that everyone looks for?

Speaker 1:

The people do, but the government's got other intentions, the deep state's got other intentions, cia's got other intentions and it's very unfortunate, it's extremely unfortunate. I was watching a video by Johnny Harris, you know, when Cuba took the nuclear bombs to, uh, was it russia? Was it russia was? Was it cuba not, sorry, when cuba was pointing nuclear missiles to america? Right, kennedy did not, did not stay in white house that night. He went to this party on the street that he lived on with the most powerful people and he talked to them about it. So, like, I really recommend people watch that video about Deep State by Johnny Harris to learn more about this. How, you know what was his name? Something Truman, who was the thing of CIA. Again, I forgot his name, okay, founder of CIA. Founder of CIA. Even he said that he made a massive mistake. Um, yeah, truman, truman, founder of cia. Quote on cia mistake. Okay, I would. Certainly I would wait a second CI director, joe, joe Trent. No, tell him, don't know where I need to find him seems like.

Speaker 1:

It seems like an Instagram quote no, no, it's not an Instagram quote.

Speaker 2:

It definitely isn't they just put a string of couple of random sentences together and then slap a name on it well, I'll keep looking.

Speaker 2:

That's so unfortunate, because it's such a good quote as well I think I think I've I've seen that before somewhere as well, but I'm not sure if it's a real quote or not. Where he's. He says it's the the biggest mistake they ever made, and this kind of keeps being brought up now as well, how these three-letter corporations I don't know what you'd call them in America are ruining the country, Like the FBI, CIA and all these bureaucrats. They're taking all the money and not doing any work and actually doing work. That is not good for the American people.

Speaker 1:

Okay. So Harry S Truman said found it. For some time I have been disturbed by the way CIA has been diverted from its original assignment. It has become an operational and, at times, policy-making arm of the government. Yeah, found it. Guys, thank you for your patience. Well done. Um, yeah, found it. Guys, thank you for your patience. But even like yeah man, even he's, he was like yo what you guys are starting to do it's extremely unethical.

Speaker 2:

And you know, to influence government, influence elections, some rich people behind the scenes, like that's not democratic yeah, but this also, like you said earlier, it shows the importance of journalism and how powerful it really is, because when people want to hide something, the first thing they do is attack the journalists. For example, if you look at what's going on in gaza right now, never have this many journalists been killed in such a short period of time in a conflict before, and it's it's because they don't want you to see the aftermath. They're not allowing um independent journalists to go in as well and see what's going on there. But people like douglas murray can go in. Douglas murray, the right-wing racist uh, can go in and see like posing as a journalist, but actual independent journalists can't. This guy who shows for Israel has somehow got access, but for everyone else it's too dangerous. Like it's so clear, it's so obvious what's going on, but people are pretending they just don't see it it's very unfortunate man.

Speaker 1:

Anything else in this matter?

Speaker 1:

no, let's call it a day, let's call it a day, yeah, but respect to all these journalists out there, man putting their neck on the line. People like johnny harris, who's an american, does honest, like, extremely objective um journalism. I urge everyone to check it out. He's done incredible like, like especially the one about cia, and like to speak about such topics and put your neck on the line. And also to the people in palestine, like you know, there's that woman I forgot her name, mortars and a couple other people, um that are putting their necks on the line. You know, for humanity, um, show them your support. You know, show them your support and let's encourage journalism to have freedom of speech that they need and deserve. And it's very good news that julian assange is free, um, as he should have been from the get-go. And, yeah, man, anything else.

Speaker 2:

Do you want to finish your essay?

Speaker 1:

No, I'm not done yet. Okay, thanks for listening everyone. Thank you for watching, guys, and sorry for the little monologue. But, not sorry.

Speaker 2:

All right, all the best.

Speaker 1:

Bye-bye, bye-bye.

People on this episode